Tag Archives: Musical

The Play That Killed Love: The Sequel to Phantom of the Opera

Now Playing


Phantom of the Opera is one of the best known musicals of all time. It has been running continuously around the world since it premiered in 1986, it won six Tony Awards for its original Broadway production, and it was made into a popular movie in 2004. It is the longest running Broadway show ever, having reached 10,000 performances in 2012. So, as happens with many successful franchises, a sequel was developed. Andrew Lloyd Webber, no longer guided by Gaston Leroux’s original work, went completely off the rails in the new story. The story is poorly written, the characters – who had at least some depth in the original show – were flattened to a single dimension each (if that), and the music – usually Webber’s saving grace – was simply bad. Let’s take a look at the sequel that defined horror through its existence and not its story, Love Never Dies.




Love Never Dies takes place 10 years after the end of Phantom of the Opera. Sort of. Webber seems to have forgotten that he set Phantom in 1881, since Love Never Dies takes place “10 years later” in 1907. In fact, the prologue of Phantom shows Raoul as elderly and confined to a wheelchair in 1905. Hurray for continuity. Temporal distortions aside, the story is set in the United States rather than in France, specifically at Coney Island. It turns out that the Phantom was behind the creation of Coney Island because he wanted a method to lure Christine – now a singer famous across Europe – back to him. The grand opening of Coney Island is, somehow, the excuse he needs to invite her to perform.

Christine accepts the invitation and arrives to America with her son Gustave and her husband Raoul in tow. In the 10 years or so between the plays, Raoul has gone from being a passionate and doting lover to a mean drunk who has accrued a large gambling debt that forces Christine to take singing jobs she does not want to take, such as the opening performance at Coney Island. The Phantom has been aided and supported by Meg and Madame Giry, who immigrated to America after the events of Phantom and saved up money to bring the Phantom into the country. In spite of 10 years, give or take, of providing for the Phantom, Meg still cannot get the musical genius to notice her singing and dancing skills. She was working to be the star of the opening night show, but the arrival of Christine bumps her from the spotlight.


Not that he's obsessed with her or anything.

Not that he’s obsessed with her or anything.


It is worth noting at this point that Christine and Raoul do not know that the invitation to perform came from the Phantom; they do not know who the owner of the theme park is, just that he offered to pay enough to wipe away Raoul’s gambling debts. Raoul learns of the Phantom’s involvement when he encounters Madame Giry in a bar at the same time as the Phantom reveals himself to Christine in her room. The Phantom recounts with Christine the affair they had 10-ish years ago on the night before her wedding to Raoul, and she reveals that, had the Phantom stayed after that one night, she would have left Raoul at the altar for him.


At least she's still obsessed with him too.

At least she’s still obsessed with him too.


At this point, Gustave interrupts the reminiscing, and the Phantom promises to show him all around Coney Island. The boy eventually ends up in the Phantom’s secret lair, where he avails himself of the assembled musical equipment and shows how skilled he is with music. Far too skilled to only have one musically gifted parent. Shock and surprise, spoiler alert, Gustave is not Raoul’s son, but the Phantom’s. After that highly anticlimactic reveal that was telegraphed from the start of the show, the Phantom launches into a song better suited for Rock of Ages than a show about early 20th century opera singers. After rocking out with daddy dearest, Gustave freaks out upon seeing the Phantom’s real face, just like Christine did in the original. Christine confirms that the Phantom is Gustave’s father, and promises never to tell that to her son.


This goes exactly as well as one would expect.

This goes exactly as well as expected.


Raoul, meanwhile, is still off drinking and gambling and generally making terrible life choices. Including his choice to make a bet with the Phantom that Christine will not sing at the opening. If she chooses not to and to leave with Raoul, then the Phantom will pay off all of Raoul’s gambling debts. If she does sing, then Raoul must leave, alone, and may never see his wife and her son again. Betting on one’s wife in a play goes about as well as it has since Taming of the Shrew, and Raoul slinks off, defeated, as Christine begins to sing the titular song.


Phantom of the Opera Wins


Then, because there wasn’t enough (read: any) action to speak of in the play, the final scene crams a play’s worth of plot into 10 minutes. It turns out that Meg got the money to support the Phantom through prostitution, an unnecessary twist that had zero warning. The fact that the Phantom still chooses Christine over her causes her to descend rapidly into madness, and she kidnaps and threatens to kill Gustave. The Phantom tries to give her an inspiring speech about how she can be so much more than what she is, and he decides that telling her she just isn’t as good as Christine is the right negotiation tactic. This works about as well as one might expect, and Meg releases Gustave so that she can shoot Christine instead. Christine dies after breaking her promise and telling Gustave that the mean, drunk man who raised him for his whole life was not his father, but the creepy, mangled man who kidnapped mommy once and killed a few dozen people actually is his father. The end.


The face of a crazed hooker.  In a bathing suit.

The face of a crazed hooker. In a chorus line.


This being a musical, there happen to be a number of songs to tell this insipid story. Or rather, that is normally the point of the songs in a musical, to tell and advance the story. In this show, however, the songs have the effect of breaking up the story more than carrying it. Part of this is due to the fact that the songs do not have a unifying structure to them. In Phantom, the song styles were more uniform. They were grand, nearly operatic songs that felt like they belonged in the scenes and the time period. The songs in Love Never Dies are disjointed, scattered haphazardly, and do not fit the tone, tenor or time of the show. This can pull the audience out of the reality that the show is trying to build, not that the audience would really want to stay in that reality anyway.



The Phantom likes to surround himself with freaks.


There are only two good songs, and they’re not actually good for the intended reason of “beautiful music and memorable lyrics.” The first is the song “Dear Old Friend,” sung when Raoul encounters Madame Giry and Christine encounters Meg Giry. This song is good because it’s funny to hear the passive-aggressive undertones to the words being said. They are all realizing that their lives are ruined by the presence of these other people who used to be their friends, and they greet each other kindly outwardly, while still letting each other know that their being in that place only means the worst for everyone. The second good song is “The Beauty Underneath,” the rock song that caps the first act. This song is good by how terribly placed it is. This song absolutely does not belong in this musical, and the whole show would be better for it being absent. All the same, it is the only memorable song, and it certainly livens up an otherwise dreary show.

The only thing that could possibly save this show is a good set of characters. Sadly, they’re just as big of a letdown as the rest. Raoul becomes an unlikable drunk, Christine turns out to have only been in love with the Phantom the whole time, Meg and Madame Giry get treated by the Phantom the same way that Webber treats them, as throwaway characters only serving to give the Phantom convenient access to the outside world.


Same caption as previous.

Same caption as previous.


The whole show seems to be written like a fanfiction intended to show how cool the Phantom is, and to give him the happy ending he deserved over that jerk Raoul. And that’s actually what this show is, fanfiction. Webber takes the characters from the original novel and makes up his own story about them, completely separate from the source material. He rewrites the story the way he wants with the hero he wants. Never mind that the Phantom was the murderous and terrifying villain in the book, and Raoul was the noble hero. The Phantom still deserved to get the girl. And win. Because that is what Webber wants.


Love Never Dies was written by Andrew Lloyd Webber and Ben Elton as a sequel to Phantom of the Opera. A filmed version of the stage play can be found on DVD, if you really feel the need to suffer.

Galavant…ing Around Quality

Hulu Now Streaming


The eight episode first season run of Galavant on ABC has only just ended, though with the promise of more to come. For four weeks, Sunday nights had an hour dedicated to a “musical comedy extravaganza.” At least, that’s what the commercials said. The reality is different. For every joke that landed, three missed. For every catchy song that could be hummed for days, there was another that just had to be suffered for the sake of getting through the show. The plot was formulaic and predictable, but that isn’t to say that it was unenjoyable; in fact, it was often amusing watching it play out. The real high point to the show, though, is the cast and the way that the actors portray the characters. The show even brought in a series of well-known guest stars to augment the regular players. While the cast and characters are the main reasons to sit down and watch the show, let’s take a look at the highs and lows that one should consider before watching Galavant.




The first thing to consider in any “musical comedy” is the music. The show’s theme song, which is used with different words throughout the first episode and at the start and end of each week’s pair of episodes, is powerful and fun. It was a great way to start the series, and it’s the type of song that hooks viewers up front. Unfortunately, it also creates an expectation for the rest of the series that is never met. No other song in the season stands out nearly so much. There are others that are good, but when stacked up against how the show opens, they simply aren’t that memorable. Normally at this point, a list of what songs are good versus what songs are bad would follow, but Galavant throws a curve ball into that aspect of reviewing: the song styles vary. From doo-wop to drinking song to traditional Broadway number, there is no predominant song type. As such, opinions on which songs are the best are based on the tastes of the individual. The show does a good job of covering genres, so there is something for everyone. But the wide variety also means that everyone will have songs they greatly dislike as well.



A similar thing can be said about the comedy. It tries too hard to cover too many types of comedy, and so it both amuses and disappoints in turn. By far the weakest attempts at humor were the ones predicated on situational irony, mostly because the show was too easy to predict. If the audience knows what’s about to happen, there’s no laugh to be had when it does happen. Anachronistic jokes often fell just as flat; one character spends minutes trying to convince others that the idea for a zipper is a great plan, while his companions mock the thought. Having said all that, there are a number of one-liners and sarcastic asides in each episode that do hit home. The show may be inconsistent in its comedy, but when every line is intended as a joke, getting a laugh for even a quarter of them still makes for a decently funny show.




With the music and the comedy out of the way, let’s look at the “extravaganza” part of the show, the plot and the characters. The show starts as a classic tale of an evil king kidnapping a fair maiden and a gallant knight riding to rescue his true love. Then the opening song ends and every part of that last sentence gets thrown out the window. Madalena (Mallory Jansen), the damsel in distress turns out to be quite a distressing damsel, choosing money and power over love and generally making hell the lives of everyone else in the show. The evil King Richard (Timothy Omundson) turns out to be a pushover and a wuss who only wants to be liked, even if he has to invade neighboring kingdoms to accomplish that mission. And the brave knight Sir Galavant (Joshua Sasse), the titular character, falls into a year-long depression, trading all his fighting skills and his sense of self-worth for kegs of ale, despite the efforts of his loyal squire Sid (Luke Youngblood).



Sid the Squire (Youngblood) and Sir Galavant (Sasse)


The show picks up a year later when a beautiful princess named Isabella Maria Lucia Elisabetta of Valencia (Karen David) comes seeking the mighty hero Sir Galavant to help her reclaim her kingdom from King Richard. Richard had conquered the land in order to find the fabled Jewel of Valencia, which he believed could buy him Madalena’s love. Isabella enlists Galavant’s help by lying to him, telling him that Richard had beaten Madalena and that Madalena longed for Galavant. Richard knew this story would draw Galavant to the castle so that he could be executed, and he threatened the lives of Isabella’s parents in order to motivate her to tell it.



Luke Youngblood, Mallory Jansen, Joshua Sasse, Timothy Omundson, Vinnie Jones and Karen David


While Galavant, Isabella and Sid travel toward the castle and the waiting trap, Richard realizes that Madalena doesn’t respect him and never will until he proves he can be a strong person and a strong leader. He enlists the help of those around him – his personal bodyguard, his personal chef and the jester that his wife is openly cheating with – to teach him how to be a better man, though these efforts prove fruitless. Madalena, realizing that she wants power and wealth without the burden of Richard, becomes the evil bitch she feels she was always meant to be, orchestrating layers and layers of plots designed to leave her the sole ruler. The three stories finally converge at the castle, and the season finale leaves the audience less hanging from a cliff than rolling down a mildly sloping hill. It clearly sets up for a second season and leaves many dangling threads, but there is no impending doom or danger for any of the characters.




The plot is fairly predictable throughout, but it is heavily driven by the interactions of the various characters, and the actors do a wonderful job bringing them to life. They are over the top caricatures, they fit standard tropes and they are deeply flawed, and these qualities make them a pleasure to watch. The three-story structure also allows a lot of guest stars entry into the show, whether as a wizard named Xanax whom Richard visits to help him relax (Ricky Gervais) or as a rival knight whose go-to response is “Yo mama” (John Stamos) or as a monk who has taken a vow of singing (Weird Al Yankovic). These quirky side characters add a lot to the show, and the audience’s excitement over their inclusion can help to cover up the somewhat haphazard storylines that incorporate them.


Weird Al Yankovic and Ricky Gervais in Galavant

Weird Al Yankovic and Ricky Gervais in Galavant


Overall, it’s not a bad show, but it’s not the great show it was touted to be. The first episode was fun and set up the story well, and the second was a good follow up. The excitement and novelty of the idea dies down near the beginning of episode three, but by then there is a sense of investment in seeing the characters through the remaining episodes. At that point, the remainder of the season is short enough that it ends before it gets to be too much to slog through to finish the story. In the end, it’s a fun waste of a few hours, and a few songs and jokes might stand out, but don’t expect too much from it.

Galavant just ended its first season on ABC and is now available for streaming on Hulu. It was created by Dan Fogelman and stars Joshua Sasse, Timothy Omundson, Vinnie Jones, Mallory Jansen, Karen David and Luke Youngblood.

I wish…

Now Playing


Disney gave audiences a great gift this Christmas in the form of Into the Woods, a cinematic version of one of Stephen Sondheim’s most popular Broadway musicals. It’s a story that retells and interweaves classic fairytales, including Little Red Riding Hood, Jack and the Beanstalk and Rapunzel. With a solid storyline to adapt for the screen, a Tony Award-winning soundtrack and a stellar cast, this is a movie worth seeing.




If it’s not evident from the opening paragraph, this movie is a musical. Go into the theatre expecting lots of singing. Songs move a lot of the action in the film. I feel this needs to be clear and stated up front because as I walked out of the theatre, a surprising number of people were saying, “I didn’t know it was a musical,” or, “There was too much singing.” If you’re not a fan of musicals in general, no matter the genre, don’t go see this movie. If you’re open to giving musicals a try, however, and you like fairytales, this is a great starter musical.

Note that I won’t be critiquing the fairytale logic used in terms of the storytelling. Things such as people getting eaten by wolves and surviving, beanstalks growing to the sky overnight, climbable hair and people being able to talk to birds are just accepted as magical. I’m not looking to quarrel with the Brothers Grimm about precisely how far a giant would have to fall to be killed.


Emily Blunt and James Corden as the Baker and his Wife

Emily Blunt and James Corden as the Baker and his Wife


Additionally, given how much of a fan I am of the original play, I’ll do my best to be impartial and judge the movie on its own merits. That does not mean, however, that I won’t make some comparisons between the two.

For example, many of the problems in the film come from simple differences between screen and stage. Though Sondheim himself was involved in all aspects of the movie except the editing, the film does stay remarkably true to the play’s script, down to exact lines being repeated. However, a straight adaptation of a play to a film often does not work. One such point is the transition between plots. The first half of the play and the movie both involve the main characters traveling through the woods to get their dearest wishes. The second half happens sometime later, but involves the characters discovering that wishes have consequences, and that happily-ever-after doesn’t always last. This divide in plots works well for the stage show, where intermission can separate the two halves. In the movie, however, there is no divide, and it’s somewhat jarring to go from a celebration that many in the theatre thought was the end of the movie (people were standing to leave) to another 45 minutes of a new plot.


Meryl Streep as the Witch

Meryl Streep as the Witch


The other poor transitions from stage to film were not nearly as major. There were points at which Jack (Daniel Huttlestone) seemed to be overacting a little, but that could only be seen during close shots in his big number “Giants in the Sky.” Huttlestone sang the piece wonderfully, but he looked constantly surprised. While this was probably meant to be portraying his shock at finding giants living in a palace on the clouds, it looked more like he couldn’t believe the sounds coming from his own mouth. This overacting, which can help in the theatre when people in the seats might be too far away to see small facial changes, does not work for the big screen, where every tic and gesture is hard to miss. The other overacting scene belonged to the two princes (Chris Pine and Billy Magnussen) during the song “Agony,” though that was surely intentional, meant to show the characters’ over-the-top nature; it turned out well, and was a funny scene to accompany a funny song.


Billy Magnussen and Chris Pine performing "Agony"

Billy Magnussen and Chris Pine performing “Agony”


Audiences should also go into this movie realizing that the focus is on the characters and the score, not on the scenery – another holdover from the stage. While the backgrounds are beautiful and well designed, they are also fairly static. A lot of the sets are seen multiple times, and it can be hard to tell different sections of the forest from others. There are a few grand, sweeping shots, but, on the whole, the point of the movie is not where the characters are so much as what they’re doing and saying. The special effects were rather muted too, but again, not the point.

Now, saying that the focus isn’t on the scenery and effects doesn’t mean that the movie isn’t visually striking. The costumes are impeccable; the outfit for the Wolf (Johnny Depp) is particularly imaginative (I will say, though, the Wolf costume from the stage show has its own, shall we say, anatomical merits; I recommend an image search…). The actors are all incredibly attractive people too; even while Meryl Streep as the Witch is complaining about being cursed with ugliness, she’s still one of the most beautiful women on the planet.


Johnny Depp as the Wolf

Johnny Depp as the Wolf


Speaking of actors, aside from the overacting issues mentioned, the characters are brought to life by an incredibly talented cast lineup. The main cast is made up of six actors: Daniel Huttlestone (Jack), James Corden and Emily Blunt (the Baker and his Wife), Meryl Streep (the Witch), Anna Kendrick (Cinderella) and Lilla Crawford (Little Red Riding Hood). While the cast is rounded out by actors such as Christine Baranski (Cinderella’s step-mother) and Tracy Ullman (Jack’s mother), these six carry the action and the story. The jokes are delivered with precise timing, the personality of the characters is found and displayed expertly and, more than anything, these actors can sing.


Anna Kendrick as Cinderella

Anna Kendrick as Cinderella


The soundtrack for this movie is nothing less than beautiful. Even compared to the soundtracks from the staged shows, this soundtrack with these actors is a powerful musical selection. I’ll admit to a bit of apprehension about the soundtrack before it was released; Johnny Depp in Sweeny Todd and Meryl Streep in Mamma Mia were not at their best vocally. My fears for this movie, however, were quickly scattered. Though Depp is perhaps the weakest singer of the group, even his number “Hello, Little Girl” was solid, and he was a great choice for the role; he played the pedophilic wolf with a level of weirdness audiences have come to expect from him. Daniel Huttlestone and Lilla Crawford, despite their young ages, are quite talented musically; Jack and Little Red Riding Hood have some fun but challenging songs in this film, and they were beautiful to hear. Anna Kendrick was a good fit for Cinderella, and her voice stood out in every song she sang. James Corden and Emily Blunt seemed to have a lot of fun with their songs, and their enthusiasm showed through the music. Meryl Streep, however, was far and away the star vocalist. The Witch gets the largest number of solos in the movie, and all of these songs are emotional and powerful and beautiful. For sheer hilarity, however, my favorite song is “Agony,” sung by the princes about how unfair life is to them (video below).



Stephen Sondheim’s fairytale play about taking care what you wish for and your wish’s ability to bring you happiness suffered some hiccups in the transition from stage to screen, but it is one of the best film adaptations of a stage musical to date. It is a PG-rated Disney movie, so it is appropriate for all ages, though it did lose some of the dark edge that makes the staged show so popular. There is a filmed version of the stage show on DVD and Netflix, if you’re ever in the mood to see the original. In the meantime, however, the film adaptation is an amazing rendition of a classic play, and one that I would recommend to any fan of good music, musical theatre or fantasy and fairytales.

Into the Woods is in theatres now. It is directed by Rob Marshall, distributed by Walt Disney Studios Motion Pictures and is based on the musical play of the same name by Stephen Sondheim.